IGA
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) & Access Modeling
This control asks one thing: How are access roles defined, governed, and maintained to support scalable provisioning and governance?
Low Maturity
What Failure Looks Like
The documented failure mode at level 0 (Absent) on the 0 to 4 maturity scale:
Access entropy. Every new hire increases complexity, and toxic access combinations proliferate unnoticed.
High Maturity
What Good Looks Like
The business value the methodology documents at level 4 (Optimized):
Minimizes access debt while supporting rapid organizational change.
Next Step
A Typical Next Move
For programs sitting around level 0 (Absent), the methodology recommends this as the next rational step:
Identify high-volume job functions and document baseline access patterns.
What reaching level 2 (Developing) unlocks
Reduced access requests.
Evidence
Evidence Assessors Ask For
A sample of the artifacts an assessor expects to see around level 2 (Developing):
- Role mining outputs
- Periodic role reviews
- Defined owners for role definitions
Compliance
Compliance Frameworks That Cite This Control
The bank's regulatory mapping for IGA-04 resolves to 5 frameworks with a researched compliance threshold. Weakness here shows up in audits, not only in incidents.
Where Does Your Program Land on IGA-04?
This page is the teaser layer. The full rubric behind IGA-04 defines 5 scored maturity levels, 0 to 4, each with its own operating model, evidence expectations, and regulatory citations. That rubric is the scoring instrument, so it ships inside the assessment rather than on a marketing page. Running the assessment takes about 20 minutes and no signup is required to start.